Wyatt Employment Law Report

U.S. House Seeks to Block President Obama’s Ability to Recess Appoint Officials

Leave a comment

By Edwin S. Hopson

In July, 2011, Congressman Jeff Landry, a Republican from Louisiana, announced that he was part of an effort in the U.S. House of Representatives intent on keeping the House of Representatives in session continuously in order to prevent the U.S. Senate from going into recess without the House’s consent.  The purpose is to prevent President Obama from issuing recess appointments.  The last recess appointment, according to Representative Landry, was Craig Becker to the National Labor Relation Board.  In a July 1, 2011, press release, Landry stated:

“This morning – under the instruction of Speaker Boehner, Leader Cantor, and Whip McCarthy – I presided over a pro forma session in the United States House of Representatives, preventing Congress from going into recess and blocking President Obama from issuing recess appointments. * * *  Under Article 1, Section 5 of the Constitution, the House of Representatives can prevent the Senate from recessing by withholding its consent.  Simply put:  we do so by voting down, or not considering, a Senate adjournment resolution.  And when we do so, we block the Administration’s ability to make recess appointments.”

Congressman Landry, in his press release, stated that he is leading a coalition of 77 freshmen Congressmen requesting that the House Republican leadership take measures to prevent any recess appointment by President Obama for the remainder of the 112th Congress.

The impact of this action could be a cessation of the National Labor Relations Board’s ability to issue decisions after December 31, 2011, when Member Becker’s recess appointment expires.  At that time it will be down to two members.  Under the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in New Process Steel v. National Labor Relations Board, 130 S. Ct. 2635 (2010), the NLRB lacks the power under the National Labor Relations Act to issue decisions once the five member board gets down to less than three members.

Leave a reply. Please note that although this blog may be helpful in informing clients and others who have an interest in information privacy and security, it is not intended to be legal advice. The information on this blog also should not be relied upon to form an attorney-client relationship.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s