Wyatt Employment Law Report

NLRB Inviting Briefs on Whether Union Supporters May Use Company Email for Union Activities

Leave a comment

By Edwin S. Hopson

In Register Guard, 351 NLRB 1110 (2007) the Board (a majority of whom were Republicans), enforced an employer policy which prohibited employees from using its email system for non-work-related purposed. It stated then that “… employees have no statutory right to use the[ir] Employer’s e-mail system for Section 7 purposes.”

On October 24, 2013, an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision in Purple Communications, Inc., 21-CA-095151, 21-RC-091531, and 21-RC-091584, dismissing the General Counsel’s claim that the employer violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act by maintaining a policy prohibiting personal use of its electronic equipment and systems. The ALJ based his decision on Register Guard. The General Counsel and the charging party labor organization filed exceptions requesting that the NLRB overrule Register Guard.

On May 1, 2014, the Board announced that it was inviting the parties and amici to file briefs and address the following questions.

  1. “Should the Board reconsider its conclusion in Register Guard that employees do not have a statutory right to use their employer’s email system (or other electronic communications systems) for Section 7 purposes?
  2. If the Board overrules Register Guard, what standard(s) of employee access to the employer’s electronic communications systems should be established? What restrictions, if any, may an employer place on such access, and what factors are relevant to such restrictions.
  3. In deciding the above questions, to what extent and how should the impact on the employer of employees’ use of an employer’s electronic communications technology affect the issue?
  4. Do employee personal electronic devices (e.g., phones, tablets), social media accounts, and/or personal email accounts affect the proper balance to be struck between employers’ rights and employees’ Section 7 rights to communicate about work-related matters? If so, how?
  5. Identify any other technological issues concerning email or other electronic communications systems that the Board should consider in answering the foregoing questions, including any relevant changes that may have occurred in electronic communications technology since Register Guard was decided. How should these affect the Board’s decision?”

The parties and amici were invited by the Board “to submit empirical and other evidence.” Briefs are due no later than June 16, 2014.

Leave a reply. Please note that although this blog may be helpful in informing clients and others who have an interest in information privacy and security, it is not intended to be legal advice. The information on this blog also should not be relied upon to form an attorney-client relationship.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s